maniac1075 Forum Index maniac1075
A message board for my website & all the other crap that goes on.
Menu
maniac1075 Forum IndexHome
FAQFAQ
MemberlistMemberlist
UsergroupsUsergroups
RegisterRegister
ProfileProfile
Log in to check your private messagesMessages
Log inLogin/Out

Quick Search

Advanced Search

Links
Sample Link 1
Sample Link 2

Who's Online
[ Administrator ]
[ Moderator ]


Google Search
Google

http://www.phpbb.com
Are remasters really neccesary?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    maniac1075 Forum Index -> Music
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
thunderhayes
I dont care about you, just about me


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Location: Smyrna, GA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 6:01 am    Post subject: Are remasters really neccesary? Reply with quote

This is what I've often been wondering, sure, it helps get something out to a new audience, but a lot of times remasters aren't even done, but rather something is just re-issued with a louder sounding media, and labeled as a "remaster".

I'd like to get some of yalls opinions on this.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Maniac1075
Pro Wanka


Joined: 10 Jul 2005
Posts: 1558
Location: Hellbourne

PostPosted: Sun Mar 25, 2007 10:18 am    Post subject: Re: Are remasters really neccesary? Reply with quote

well I thought some of the re masters sounded better. But I like it more when re-masters come with fucking bonus tracks, unlike AC/DC's which just had stupid fucking links to a site that has some bonus shit.... especially when dealing with a band who no one seems to have informed them that a CD will hold 80mins of material and not just what an LP's limit used to be.

The news about AC/DC having enough material to do a double album.... probably just means they have enough material to do a full CD this time! Hence the just over 40 minutes from the last album... 6 fucking years ago.

_________________

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
thunderhayes
I dont care about you, just about me


Joined: 25 Jul 2006
Posts: 447
Location: Smyrna, GA, USA

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 10:36 am    Post subject: Re: Are remasters really neccesary? Reply with quote

Maniac1075 wrote:
well I thought some of the re masters sounded better. But I like it more when re-masters come with fucking bonus tracks, unlike AC/DC's which just had stupid fucking links to a site that has some bonus shit.... especially when dealing with a band who no one seems to have informed them that a CD will hold 80mins of material and not just what an LP's limit used to be.

The news about AC/DC having enough material to do a double album.... probably just means they have enough material to do a full CD this time! Hence the just over 40 minutes from the last album... 6 fucking years ago.


Well many ariststs still don't use the full length of an album, but rather just use 40 - 70 minutes of length.

And vinyl still holds the same amount it always has, just around 45 - 50 minutes.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    maniac1075 Forum Index -> Music All times are GMT - 12 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Effex-Media Web Resources
Create your own free forum now!
Terms of Service Purchase Ad Removal Forum Archive Report Abuse